Imagine the following: you are told by your lawyer that you have inherited a piece of land in a
village nearby. You did not know that
this land was going to become yours, in fact you did not know of its
existence. You are given the official plan
of the property so off you go to see it. However, because the plan is small and does not show a large enough area
to identify the plot accurately, you mistakenly believe a nearby plot is the
one belonging to you. You decide to sell
it so you show it to the estate agent and give him the plan. Your co-owner agrees with the sale and
accordingly signs the mandate (this authorises the agent to sell the property).
The agent checks the plan against the land itself and sees
that it shows a plot which seems to agree with the plan and he assumes the
owner knows his property. He takes the
photographs and prepares the description of the plot for use on his web site
and in his database. Everything has been
done in good faith, but of course the real plot is a bit different – the slope
is steeper, the entry point a bit more awkward and it is a bit further away from
the stream and the village.
The estate agent has a large team working for him who rely
on the information entered in the computer database as being accurate. One of his agents shows his clients the plot
as identified in the photos and as apparently shown on the plan, supported by
the agent’s “For Sale” sign on the roadside. The client makes an offer for the plot he was shown, and this is accepted.
Nobody has told the agents or the vendors about the
misplaced sign. The co-vendors were both
under the impression they were talking about the correct plot, but one was
always referring to the wrong plot. The
agent who showed the plot was acting in good faith on information provided in
the normally accurate manner. The buyers
also saw the property plan while looking over the plot and did not detect any
error themselves.
The Notaire is working from the documents including the plan
and the description provided by the agent and the plot number as provided by
the land registry. Nothing can suggest
to him that there has been any error.
This combination of unlikely coincidences led to the identity
mistake, which has certainly never happened to this agent before and must be
rare even nationwide. The buyer can check with the map at the Mairie to see if
it agrees with the plot on the ground. He can ask the vendors to show him the plot before signing any document
(but to what avail if the vendor himself does not know?) and he can ask the
agent to double check his information. But sometimes mistakes will happen despite all precautions.
“Caveat emptor” has to be the cruel rule applied
here. Certainly there was no dishonesty
on the agent’s or vendor’s part, and the mistake was genuine. If the buyers report the mistake immediately
it might be possible to annul the sale (if the vendors consent). If the buyers cannot accept the “right” plot,
they must initiate legal proceedings to recover whatever may be allowed them by
the courts. The agent’s insurance
company cannot make any payments without a court judgement. The agent himself is not in a position to
rectify the transaction.